Comments on: Deal Done, Banta-Cain Signs

By: unknown niner

unknown niner — Tue, 01 Jan 2008 15:59:31 +0000

I predict that Banta Cain will be a bust!

By: pintor98

pintor98 — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 04:23:39 +0000

WILLIS is our guy. We can’t trade down. Buffalo will pick him with the 12th they lost London Flecher. or St Louis @13 or Carolina @14 In the second we can get Steve Smith or Joason Hil I agree we should trade a 3rd and 4th and a 6th for a 2nd. That would give us (1) 1st (2) 2nd’s and (1) 3rd (comp) and (3)(4)4th rd and (1) 5th

By: cudweeds

cudweeds — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 20:09:04 +0000

Don’t care who this wise guy is. I say hire Ditka as coach, Montana as QB, and Rice as WR – fire everyone else. Niners will win everytime… save a lot of money too!

By: Boomer

Boomer — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 13:57:03 +0000

how much cap space do you really need to sign your draft picks? we have about 11.5 million left to spend…so if we need that to sign our picks, then were pretty much done in FA…or to even extend Gores contract….

By: Ryan the 1st

Ryan the 1st — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 06:05:15 +0000

The Kwame issue MUST be adressed in the second round….unless Blalock or that central michigan o linman is gone….otherwise…..defense defense, and or a good wideout (if he IS A STEAL)

By: Straighthate

Straighthate — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:44:22 +0000

trade down a few picks in the first and get willis if branch or by some weird chain of events a tremendous pass rusher isn’t available. then use all these picks we’d have and get a couple extra second and third round picks. I say screw the depth right now, get some legit starters (one good wr and the rest on defense). We don’t have a good enough team to worry about depth. Get some guys who will be starters for years to come and fill in the gaps later.

By: Ryan the 1st

Ryan the 1st — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:31:02 +0000

Willis is a must if Landry and Branch aren’t available….sure up the linebacker core….why not? UNLESS BRANCH IS THERE BECAUSE HE IS GOING TO COLLAPSE THE POCKET OR LANDRY who would be our free safety of the future. Otherwise get the sure thing that can start immediately (Willis). As for the second round….I REALLY THINK we need to try and land another pick in that round and get rid of a 3rd, a fourth, and a 5th….why wouldn’t someone take that deal…..like the texans, the falcons, or the dolphins….all have coaches that are trying to rebuild the franchise and the way to do that is cut the old and draft the new. We need to make some calls…..I think we are going to be shocked about what type of talent will fall to that round.

By: GREG

GREG — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:21:29 +0000

ryan i completely agree the second round is extremely loaded with talent…this draft is really deep…we have to trade up a little with all the later picks immediate starters in the first three rds

By: Boomer

Boomer — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 05:16:46 +0000

I dont like taking WRs in the first round….they dont touch the ball enough to be an instant impact…. lets get Willis

By: Ryan the 1st

Ryan the 1st — Wed, 07 Mar 2007 04:51:28 +0000

Why should we draft Jarrett…he will provide us with nothing this year. We could draft Jordan Kent from Oregon in the 6th round who is exactly the same build, but runs a better 40 time (4.55). I say stay where we are because Branch or Landry COULD fall to us. If they don’t then we take Willis. Either way we fill a hole. I say we trade some fourth rounders with a 5th and get another second rounder. That round will be so CRUCIAL.